If They Come For Your Guns, Do You Have A Responsibility To Fight?

I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.

Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a monarchy? Let’s look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. – Benjamin Franklin

Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become just as corrupt as any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can become corrupt.

I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of what Franklin was trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights.

Next I’d like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Militia Free Press-Supreme Court

This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here.

For those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here:

The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. – Thomas Jefferson

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good. -George Washington

The Constitution shall never be construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. – Samuel Adams.

Militia Free Press-Founging Fathers

I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice their opinions against this right have their free speech protected by your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and void, simply because “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement.

We need to keep this in mind as our “representatives” try to push gun bans. I don’t care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and simple.

A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much  in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only true American among us.

Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.

It is not my right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft sell, and many others have tried to avoid putting into print, but I am going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over.

If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson’s quote. He talks about a “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority can not take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights.

Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every single citizen, no matter what their “elected servants” say. A majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play.

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution.

Most of the articles I am reading on the subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a list that you don’t want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

I am not the “subversive” here, it is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

If I go down fighting then I was not fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical government in the 1770′s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical government. There is no difference.

This is a case of right and wrong. As of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack have a problem with the constitution then they should be removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos.

I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

What I do know is that this country was founded by people who had balls the size of Texas and Patriotic Americans take shit off of no one, especially our own government. For evidence of that, you might research the Revolutionary War. My question is how many Patriots are left?

I would hope that our officials come to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want to die free or submit to their rule. I can not tell you where you should stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a life of freedom or slavery.

Militia Free Press-Thinking

You must start thinking about this because I believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react.

I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand that “We the People” will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights to do so.

For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.

Are you willing to die to take my guns?

IMPORTANT UPDATE From Dean Garrison!!! When this post originally went viral I was trying to answer every single comment and that lasted for almost 48 hours. Then I came to grips with the fact that I am human and I can’t do it. If for no other reason I value my family and I can’t steal time from them to constantly be on the site. I want you all to know that I appreciate your support and good debate whether you agree or disagree. I also want to thank each and every American Patriot who has made the honorable choice to serve their country. Anyone who wants to repost this on their blog or website is also given permission to do so, so long as nothing is changed in the text of the article, and a link is provided back to this site. Again, thank you so much. I am humbled. It’s now 16 days later and this is still the most popular post on our blog. Keep fighting for what is right. We must stand united. – Dean Garrison 1-20-13.

54 Responses to If They Come For Your Guns, Do You Have A Responsibility To Fight?

  1. Karen DeAngelo says:

    From an Old Lady in Missourah

    • Gerard says:

      “We are fast approaching the stage of ultimate inversion: the stage where government is free to do as it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission.” – Ayn Rand

    • Patriot Warrior says:

      I have been trying to tell people this for years, long before becoming an Oath Keeper and member of the Constitutional Sheriffs. The Federal Government has been trying to convince the citizens that they are more powerful than the Constitution and Citizen, and to a degree it has worked. But what people do not realize, is that we are the true upholders of the Constitution and the true Law Keepers of every inch of this country. What we need now is for every “American Citizen to Wake the Hell Up” !!!!!!

    • GoG says:

      I am ready!

  2. pat says:

    Great article! I played it forward…hoping for momentum:)

  3. Chris says:

    Dude , I’m Canadian and I’d stand and fight for YOUR second amendment , a ppl should never be afraid of there government , a government should be scared of its people.

    • Mildred says:

      Thank you, Chris. We might take you up on that. So many of our people are ignorant (by choice in many cases) of what is happening. Glad you are paying attention anyway.

    • Mark says:

      Chris, you are right, governments should be scared of the citizens. Our government is terrified of us well armed citizens who believe in the 2nd amendment. That’s why the government calls us domestic terrorists, because they are scared we will use the 2nd for the “original intent”.

    • patrick nadeau says:

      I am also a Canadian and I was anti-gun because I did not know what was going on. THe censorship in the canadian medias seems to be strong. I visited some gun shows in USA and … I just woke up ! Now I am a pro-gun individual. IN canada, we got a ” 2d amendment ” before the U.S. … we didn’t really loose it, because the new rules that covert our rights are unconstitutional. The canadian are sheeps because the censorship-media misinforms them. Do you want to see what happened to a an honest citizen who tried to expose the truth : brucemontague.ca

  4. Mike Thomas says:

    I think this article is great!! Thank You. I also would like to know how many of my neighbors would stand up and fight for their right if it were to come to that.

  5. Chuck says:

    As a Marine I will gladly fight to protect my fellow Americans right to keep and bear arms and against any other form of Tyranny that is shoved down our throats..

  6. Thomas Mick says:

    The Constitution and Bill of Rights didn’t give us a single right. There is no such thing as a constitutional right; our rights came from God and are natural rights.

  7. Brian DeNike says:

    I get what your saying. However, the law states only Congress has the power to regulate the Militia. I’ll stick with our individual rights. People always tout are second amendment. Never forget many of the liberal trolls on the SCOTUS believe its up to the States. So many states have the right to carry.

  8. Luis says:

    Having lived in a country run by tyrants for 22 years of my life, I know what they can do to you. It is not pretty. Cuba has one of the worst treatment of its “disident” citizens in the planet. That is why I took my oath to protect and defend our Constitution for 20 years in this country and I will go to my grave defending the rights enjoyed and given to me by God and that little document that few can appreciate.

  9. Manuel says:

    I owned my first gun given to me by my Dad when I was 8 years old. I have owned guns every since that time and have not killed anyone with my guns – however, I have had occasion to fire at the enemies of our Republic through my service in the military which I think is a sworn duty of every real American to serve his or her country to thank our fore fathers for our freedoms…If the government comes for my guns I will fight them tooth and nail!!!!!

  10. ByteEnable says:

    I used to dismiss the notion that our federal government had a coup in the past. Some say it happened with the JFK assassination. The more research I do only confirms that this has occurred. I’m from Texas and currently reside in Texas. The Texas politicians talk a big talk about gun ownership and the 2nd amendment. However, I have read stories about other Texan’s 2nd amendment being assaulted. I have had mine assaulted even in Williamson County, eventually I got my guns back. My point is that there are criminals even in local government. On one hand I can see why the PD’s and the SO’s are getting all these toys. Heck its free! Why not! The problem is that it goes to their head. Then they want to be rambo and use those toys on civilians. In some cases its for good, in some cases its for evil and also used out of ignorance. Overwhelming force is a military doctrine not a peace keeper doctrine. Peace keepers in this country have forgotten their mission. They have self labeled themselves “law enforcement”. Only a jury of your peers can enforce the law.

    So what this boils down to is that you have evil (criminals) or bad leaders (ignorance) that get elected to office. It’s difficult to ascertain from a moments notice if they are evil or ignorant. If they show up at your door to confiscate your weapons its one or the other.

    The primary mission of OathKeepers is to help educate those that are willing to listen. I can’t think of any other organization today that has such a noble mission; peace through education.

  11. Gary Stagner says:

    I will die with my guns protecting my country and my families right to freedom.

  12. TheSouthernNationalist says:

    Just as my fore fathers did and the patriots of old, I too will stand up and defend Liberty.

  13. Sheowahya says:

    I have often criticized foreigners whose countries are in civil war. I have taken both sides of the fence, either they should go back and fight for their country (and then STAY there), or they should comit to their new country and let the old one suffer the consequences of their own foolishness and sit by and watch it crumble.

    Now I am the one on the outside looking back at my country as it teeters on the brink of a civil war. What will I do? Will I return to the States to take up the fight against the tyranical government that has declared We The People terrorists and is preparing to put millions of my fellow countrymen into internment camps?

    This is a great article and definately adds to my thought process.

  14. lonewolf republic says:

    know whats sad the Blue side is smart and knows the world/Reality better then you red state idiots do, yet I side with red, becouse blue is doing so much wrong.you reds are just bible thumpers. and to show this. do you bleave in magic?. no? well then how you explain all the jesus comeing back to life,healing the blind? sounds magic to me,but oh wait you’re kind use to burn witchs for such acts. can any of you tell me the Reglions befor christainty? i don’t think so. and they were just as blind and ignorent as any of you are. why dont you all put that kind of Faith in the liveing and you’re race “humans” and not some enity that the onley way of truely knowing if it exists is dieing? get r done screw faith n a god. you are you’re own master of reality make it happen. dont wait for someonething that you naver seen.naver touched,and onley know of becouse of your’re parents. control you becouse when it comes down to it you are onley bleaveing what you’re shepred is telling you to do. you dont need Reglion for good Morals. the founding fathers were christain however they knew the dangers of it why you think we came to america fools.

    • Mark says:

      It’s called miracles not magic Lamewolf.
      Magic is what witches do and yes, even you have faith in something you can’t see, air. I don’t know what “reglion” you mentioned is but religion does promote good morals but doesn’t guarantee it. I would be willing to bet any amount that religious communities have much higher morals than the atheist communes.
      Maybe you should consider the possibility that you may be the fool you accuse others of being!

  15. CrustyOldGeezer says:

    The Constitution is nothing more than an IRON CLAD Contract.

    The Contract created the federal government and placed strict limitations on the powers and authorities.

    If the politicians ever feel they have nullified the Contract, all theuy would have done is nullified their job.

    There is no Contractual authority for the departments of agriculture, labor, health, education, hhs, ad nauseum.

    Any ‘cabinet’ positions betond State, Defense, Justice and Treasury cannot exist under the contract.

    With the removal of all other cabinet positions and all the regulatoy agenciwes they control, the taxes would drop to 10% of what they are now.

    Also the ‘regulations’ that currently restrict and punish businesses would be gone.

    With few regualtions to adhere to, and the vast majority of taxes still in the pockets of the People and the business owners, we would have 100% employment and a BOOMING economy.

  16. CrustyOldGeezer says:

    And IF they feds ever shut down the borders and deny ANY funds to ANY person in this country illegally, they will slef deport.

    Getting rid of 35-50 MILLION leeches will lessent the drain on the infrastructure, cut the traffic volume, cut medical costs to a reasonable level, lower the costs of housing, foods, energy costs and gasoline.

    Fewer trucks on the roads carrying everything necessary to supply the needs and demands.

    Lower crime rrates across the board.

    Less need for militarized police departments.

    I’m just not seeing a downside….

  17. LARRY d. says:

    Most if not all retired military, stand by their oath to protect and defend the Constitution. There is an estimated 30 million veterans and my guess is that 28 million are armed. If we stand together no-one will ever take any of our God given rights. Stand and fight as free men and women, or kneel as slaves to the tyrants.
    SEMPER FI ’til the day I die!
    godofhellfire Snake and nape, let ’em burn

  18. Steven H says:

    “It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. ”

    Finally, someone that gets the concept that we are a Constitutional Republic. Not a christian nation ruled majority! The Constitutional Republic was to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. As an Atheist Patriot who served in Afghanistan I know full well what the tyranny of the majority looks like, 5000 so called christians and government officials marched against me in King, NC all because I did not want any religious flag “Christian” or any other flying on our Veterans Memorial. A Veterans Memorial Honors ALL Veterans. I believe that freedom of religion also means freedom from “your” religion being forced on me by the majority or government just as our founders believed to be the case. When a majority pushes its’ will upon the minority as in the case of religion we violate the very principles of our Constitution. Thank you for your article.

    • Mark says:

      How many innocents did you kill in your “service” in Afghanistan “defending our freedom” you Godless heathen? They didn’t usurp our God given rights, U.S. politicians did and are continuing to do so.
      So who do we need to fight, primitive people who just want to be left alone or those who are REALLY destroying our freedoms and country.

    • Alice says:

      So my religion needs to be suppressed because you don’t like it?

  19. D,A, Daniels says:

    Mr. Dean Garrison,

    Sir I couldn’t agree with you more. Moreover, I also feel the exact same way about local/state/federal government agency officials, the covert rich private sector ruling class operatives, and the crazy paid American citizens working closely together with them to threaten / trample the U.S. Constitution / overall civil rights of other citizens regarding their employment, personal property, health / happiness by quite deliberately / consistently conducting against those citizens who speak / write in opposition to them acts of illegal trespassing / invading personal home property, conducting illegal home entry without warrant to deliberately search for firearms / or to confiscate, seriously damage / destroy personal property, attempt to harm / threaten family members, regularly conduct threatening / illegal monitoring invasions of privacy via email, word docs, landlines/cell phones / physical movements / regularly sending intimidating emails / other kinds of notification signals to directly indicate regular surveillance invasions of privacy along with deliberate / consistent employment blacklisting via covert operatives regularly contacting potential employers with whom lawful opposition citizens have applied for jobs, implementing invalid falsely concocted involuntary mental health evaluation arrests / detainment, and also deliberately arranging the murders of lawful citizens are real life examples of what thousands of American citizens like me and others of all races have experienced under the illegal guns of American local/state/federal government’, politician’ / rich ruling class’ hugely wrong, unethical, evil, well-orchestrated, and very deliberate forms of harassment, intimidation, character assassination, / overall life-altering persecution, which any American citizen or activist organization can be subjected to for daring to not only research / uncover accurate information, but to use it to challenge / expose in any way whatsoever any one individual or more within the tight partnership of unethical, corrupt, / truly illegal activities of government politicians, rich private sector business leaders, / wealthy citizens against all non-rich, non-wealthy Americans in general / most especially directed against middle-class, working-class, fixed-income / poor African-Americans in Washington, D.C. and nationwide. As one of the millions of descendants of African slaves in America, the one thing I most thank the slave-holding so-called “Forefathers” of America for is the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Another thing that is for certain without any question is Americans are not free given the rampant abuses / unethical actions jointly carried out by our government politicians/ lawmakers, private big business / rich ruling class citizens, government military / law enforcement, and also the clearly biased, politically-motivated, / discriminatory conduct of court judges / fixed juries in America.

  20. cpp says:

    You guys are up against a monster either gone mad or always has been. They failed you ad they want to make you pay they are starting with Texas because your reputation precedes you. This also puts you in one bad situation. Obama announced yesterday prolonged detention witch is new legislation that he is going to implement, giving the US government the right to put you i prison indefinitely for crime you may likely commit. I could not believe my ears. I am afraid that if some of you are taken to the fema camps some or all of you may very well not make it out. You must defend yourself as a soldier to avoid, in the event of capture being sent to those camps. I also believe that Texas has a big responsibility towards the rest of America and show them you will stand up for yourselves and give the courage to others to do the same. You may be ill equipped for war against them but use your imagination. A 40oz glass bottle ca be one devastating grenade if filled with lye and foil. The fumes are toxic the liquid bur anything organic the glass will break from the pressure. This will force them to wear masks witch is a advantage for you since masks are hard to see through. Elevated positions ca help a lot. Just break the ice and remember that we will always talk about the heroes that had the balls to fight against the machine.

  21. John says:

    Great article but it could have done without the plug for those poor native americans and Africans you put in there early on. As the poet said, we’re nick of siggers.

  22. Swamprat says:

    I would urge ALL Americans to read The Declaration of Independence, and compare to todays events. It will (maybe, hopefully) wake you from your complacency.

  23. patrick nadeau says:

    I am also a Canadian and I was anti-gun because I did not know what was going on. THe censorship in the canadian medias seems to be strong. I visited some gun shows in USA and … I just woke up ! Now I am a pro-gun individual. IN canada, we got a ” 2d amendment ” before the U.S. … we didn’t really loose it, because the new rules that covert our rights are unconstitutional. The canadian are sheeps because the censorship-media misinforms them. Do you want to see what happened to a an honest citizen who tried to expose the truth?

  24. JAQUE BAUER says:

    While the colonists no doubt would have fired upon the Red Coats who arrived at their home to search and confiscate any weapons that were banned, its very unlikely the average suburban owner with a safe full of assorted rifles and handguns, would do anything but comply to a modern paramilitary assault force who had just blown down the front door to his home as the family was fast asleep.

    Perhaps in rural settings on a ranch or farm there would not be a compliant gun owner, but in those cases there would be 2 Blackhawks overhead and fire teams set up on the adjacent ridge. Today, Its very unlikely that a middle class man with 3 kids, who is 50 years old and owner of an AR style rifle would trade his freedom or life in a fight against government tyranny and his right to bear arms.

    I hope I am wrong but from where I stand, recent history shows me that most Americans are soft, compliant, dis-engaged, and ignorant of how far our government has gone to enslave them. And when faced with the loss of their family, home or business, and the “good life”, possessing a “black rifle” or modern pistol is not that important to them.

    I often ask myself, what would I do if faced a with mandatory registration and confiscation scheme, and had 30 days to turn in my collection of “newly contraband” firearms, or face a raid upon my home to seize the weapons and take me into custody. Would I send my family away for an extended duration and reinforce by home against attack ? I would surly be arrested when I went out to load up on groceries. Or do I take my weapons and hide them somewhere in the country, and face government action for failing to comply.

    Maybe I would move away to community of like minded gun owners who decided to collectively stand their ground against “Waco like” attack by the regime. Ultimately there is no possible way defeat a determined authority like the US government from seizing or killing you if you remain in country.

    There is no doubt some gun owners will stand and fight, and they will likely die. But as the body count rises, the government will call these gun owners “terrorists and criminals, and destroy their reputation. They will be branded as mentally unstable, and the government will claim they are protecting the people from domestic terrorists with military weapons that threaten peace and tranquility. In the end, the losers will be the gun owners, and the American people, as the 2nd Amendment is rewritten to limit firearm rights of civilians, and the government regime becomes even more powerful as mans God given rights are trampled. I don’t believe a revolution will occur this century. Conditions are too good today. It will take a collapsed economy, mass unemployment, uncontrolled crime rates, punishing taxes, and an Autocratic regime for the people to have lost all hope, and all they have left is their lives to give. Then, and only then, will the people rise against tyranny, and overthrow an oppressive regime.

    • Camerman says:

      Jaque, you have hit many good Points, and some Truth, However you fail to realize, that as this Government, commits more and More acts of Treason, and the Police State Cracks Down..
      People are waking up at astounding numbers, and see this Government as oppressive as the British was to the Colonist, these gun grabs are not going to save these fools as the Cats out of the Bag so to speak..There are enough Vets in this Country to form the Biggest Army of Patriots ever Fielded. and they were trained by Guess Who…I have faith in the Three Percenters and I am a 66 year Old, I have not giving up and never Will…

      Semper Fi

  25. Joseph Johnson says:

    I recently found this site and it makes me proud and more secure knowing that so many other Patriots possess the desire to always respect and defend the 2nd Amendment. As mentioned so many times before, without the existence of the 2nd Amendment, all other Constituional rights mean nothing! It must be protected at all costs and I would give my life to protect it; as well as take a life to keep it. In my belief system, it is simple and just common sense. If I have committed NO crime against another citizen, my firearms stay and there will no debating or negotiating this issue.

  26. Eric Beyer says:

    Anyone who believes Americans will give up their guns is ignorant. Sure, there will be people that will comply, but when people start assembling in groups the government will back off rather than ignite the fire that will destroy them. If pushed too far any group that fights back will be joined by many others and the government just does not have enough people to fight us all. Even if the military is brought in, there will be those who will refuse to make war with the citizens of this country. Others will sabotage military efforts, it just wont work.
    During a time of war, when people were protesting and there were nightly body counts on the news, I enlisted in the US military and volunteered for duty in the western Pacific. I did so to serve my country and to protect the American way of life. I would put my life on the line again if my fellow countrymen were fighting and dying to protect the Constitution of the United States. I am confident that millions of veterans would do the same. As long as we keep our guns loaded there is no power on earth that can disarm us.

  27. twoa.forall says:

    Great article. I am as you can tell a second amendment advocate. The government has been trying to take our arms for years. I have been trying to get people to understand that. If we would get rid of all gun control our country would be alot safer. People need to realize all gun control is unconstitutional. What we need in this country is stricter penalties for using firearms in a crime. I was shot several times coming out of a night club and I DO NOT blame the gun I blame the jack ass that pulled the trigger. Our se one amendment says it shall not be infringed. Notice our elected officials are trying their best to pass any law they can to take our 2nd amendment. We must do what we can to get all gun control bills repelled. Please friend me on Facebook if you are like minded and want to preserve our constitution you can find me at twoa.forall on Facebook.

  28. csaaphill says:

    Great article and true! Problem is it’s been way past time to use arms against these tyrannts.
    Especially with I 594 being shoved upon us by a majority.
    Now I see WAC offering a $10 flat fee for gun transfers
    makes me sick people are already linning up to comply.

  29. GRAYGHOST says:

    Very good article; this country is out of control….support your local militia………


  30. csaaphill says:

    can you say pigacide?
    instead of puppycide as with how many cops shoot our dogs people should join in with those in Ferguson and Pigacide!

  31. dan says:

    I will start from the top with this statement from the article: “I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American…”

    If “truth” is your objective; perhaps you might be so good as to inform me about just ONE “Constitutional Right” that I possess. I make this request because in all of the times I have read The Constitution for the United States of America—along with ALL of the amendments (including what people call the “Bill of Rights”); yet I have not seen one single right that the Constitution grants.

    Please do not bother trying to tell me that you refer to “Constitutionally protected rights” because if you take the time to read Amendment 9, you will soon realize that if you started writing every right that our government is EXPRESSLY prohibited from infringing—you will not finish that list for nearly 100 years.

    As for that “brainwashing” by the media to which you mention? More brainwashing has been successfully performed by well-intended individuals who repeat political DISINFORMATION and other political propaganda as if it were true.

    In your “democracy” v. “republic”; I applaud you for your content for what you did write. At least you did not refer to our NATION as having been a Republic—because our nation is NOT. However, if “90% of Americans” –specifically governed citizens who have registered to vote—desire to grant a power to government; in theory our government would rightly possess that power. However, we, as the governed, are severely limited as to what powers that we may of RIGHT grant to our governments. We may of RIGHT and DUTY grant to our government only those powers that work to PRESERVE all of our rights EQUALLY.

    With your statement, “For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable” I have to serious question your motives. Are your motives as you originally state in your article—to properly inform as to our duty—or are you simply trying to more firmly cement the media and political propaganda in the minds of the governed people.

    Not even our nation’s founders saw themselves as the “gods” that you have just attempted to elevate them. The Constitution to which you just declared that you seem to “worship” is about to be disputed. Article 4, Section 4 of that Constitution declares that the Constitution is a REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Key words—FORM OF GOVERNMENT.

    There are two points of evidence to prove your claims that the Constitution is somehow “unalterable” are fabricated. The first quote comes from The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America:

    “— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. ”

    By all accounts, our FORM OF GOVERNMENT has become and has been so severely corrupted the past 150 years and still in the present—our founders have COMMISSIONED us to ALTER or to ABOLISH that FORM OF GOVERNMENT and to institute a NEW FORM.

    As promised, the second bit of evidence is found in Article 5 of the Constitution—the Amendment Article.

    You claim, “We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.”

    The Constitution is PURELY for RULING our governments. The Constitution is, as you vaguely hint—the SOVEREIGN voice: But whose voice?

    You incorrectly hint that it is the voice of the Founders. It is the VOICE of the SINGLE BODY called –the Governed. That means that it is OUR voice; your and my voice COLLECTIVELY.

    Although that Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land”; it is SUBORDINATE TO the Sovereign Authority that gave BIRTH to its existence. That Sovereign Authority –IS—nothing other than the MAJORITY of the BODY of the governed people.

    As the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND—it means that ABSOLUTELY EVERY law or act of our government MUST have a SOLID footing within that Constitution—or that act or law is UNJUST and calls for the ACTION of the Governed people to make the NECESSARY alteration to the Constitution to PUT DOWN that act of tyranny.

    You quote a man who signed The unanimous Declaration, 1776, that ESTABLISHES a DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM of granting powers to our government. But that signature authorizes a LIMITED DEMOCRACY—by DEFINITION (a definition that was in common use at the time of 1756).

    I put far more WEIGHT in the evidence that was SIGNED and ratified by the representatives for the entire body of people—rather than an INDIVIDUAL quote that is attributed to Franklin or any other one of the signers.

    Warning: Be cautious of the type of “evidence” you choose to use.

    The fact that you are spending so much time on trying to disprove a LIMITED democratic system of granting powers to our government—I must put myself on the defense against potential DISINFORMATION as I continue reading your article.

    Your statement, “In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional”; although I do not dispute the accuracy of the statement itself, I dispute is rightness.

    Article 1, Section 8, 2nd-to-last clause starts with, “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) ”

    That means that CONGRESS RIGHTLY possess every power to legislate over DC (that 10 miles square). In essence—the laws of DC are NOT subject to the Constitution. What that clause in the Constitution means—is that the clause in question is UNCONSTITUTIONAL—because it is one of the MARKS OF A TYRANNY—as detailed in The unanimous Declaration, via this grievance: “For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.”

    Once again, you use the least compelling evidence by supplying quotes from Jefferson, Washington, and Adams; when in the spirit of BEST EVIDENCE—you should have quoted this part from The Articles of Confederation that was in full effect during the 1776 between Great Britain and the newly formed united States of America, “but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores…”

    Amendment 2 changes that and puts that military ARMS SQUARELY in the hands of the governed people.

    You are looking at this situation from an improper perspective with this statement, “Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.”

    In truth, when the government comes to take your ARMS, they are VIOLATING THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND that governs political powers. WHEN government abuses its powers—it then is not only the right but it is the DUTY of the people to PUT DOWN those abuses. We ABSOLUTELY KNOW THIS, via The unanimous Declaration in this line, “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

    You claim, “If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right” to deal with them. Once again, you view this from the incorrect perspective. It is not the duty of the “individual” to stand alone. It is the DUTY of the Governed BODY to stand UNITED. Only THEN—as a UNIFIED BODY—do WE rightly possess the power to deal justly with our governments.

    Your statement, “You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty” reveals that you do not correctly comprehend the RIGHTS and DUTIES of the individual as opposed to those solely obligated to the majority of the entire body. What you suggest is your personal duty—rightly belongs to the entire body of governed citizens to put down a corrupt government.

    For being a –pro-constitution—individual your statement, “Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court”, suggests you do some more studying.

    When Congress passes any Bill (even if by 90% the first time) that violates the Constitution—it is the DUTY of the President to VETO that bill. Then, while it is being RECONSIDERED, it is the duty of the President to encourage the constituents of EVERY member of Congress who voted for that Bill originally to IMMEDIATELY RECALL those members of Congress so that it will not pass on reconsideration. THEN, if it still passes, the Courts CANNOT nullify it—but only suggest that Congress REPEAL it.

    • Cal says:

      First a comment on the article.

      “Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us”

      That is the problem, you and many others have been brainwashed to believe that if you stop the corruption going on within our governments by THOSE WHO SERVE WITHIN THEM you are”going against our government.”

      Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the constitution, but TO OVERTHROW MEN WHO PERVERT THE CONSTITUTION”

      You are incorrect.
      Our government is defined by, and assigns powers to each BRANCH or to a position not to any PERSON who SERVES – be they hired, elected, contracted, volunteer, etc – and it REQUIRES that ALL positions, all take a solemn lawfully binding Oath that they will support and defend it before anything else including the position they occupy and any orders of superiors (if any).

      The people who SERVE WITHIN our governments – state and general (federal) are put there to carry out specific put-into-writing duties listed there. The way that the duties are carried out may change, but the duties remain the same throughout time.

      Thomas Jefferson: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.”

      James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

      ALL legislation can only be created by THOSE ELECTED TO legislative branch, though they may have assistants to research, write, suggest, etc NO ONE ELSE within that branch, nor can any who serves within another branch write legislation -laws, regulations, etc – that are binding on the people.

      Yes, THAT does mean that executive orders are NOT binding on the people but are a mechanism that is allowed for the person serving as president to require all within the executive branch to do, follow, etc those EO’s. It is a way of executive branch inside administration.

      And it matters not how many times it has been unlawfully and erroneously used against the people, much like a serial killer, repeat offenses only ADD to the problem, not make it lawful.

      “This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. … “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement.”

      Actually, you are mostly correct. What you either do not realize, or are ignoring is that the American people are the First Branch of the American government;

      – As the source of the DELEGATED authority for those that serve within both the state and general(federal) governments.

      – As the Militia, the ONLY enforcement arm those who serve within our governments are allowed to use to enforce the things listed within the US Constitution and within each states Constitution when necessary and as the first level of defense within our nation.

      – To decide the guilt or innocence of any person being tried

      – To decide (jury) if a law is wrong or should be kept

      John Adams: “It would be an absurdity for jurors to be required to accept the judge’s view of the law, against their own opinion, judgment, and conscience.”

      U.S. vs. Dougherty, 1972: “The pages of history shine on instances of the jury’s exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge.”

      16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.”

      – To remove any judge that does not use *”Good Behaviour” while in office
      *US Constitution, Article III, Section 1: “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,…”

      The US Constitution assigns what all judges, state and federal, must do to be allowed to stay in a judicial position, they are:
      — Required to take, and keep an Oath(s), or a combined Oath.
      — Required to “support and defend” the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it before the duties of the office they occupy.
      — Required to carry out the enumerated duties assigned to the judicial branch by the US Constitution in a constitutional manner.

      That is “Good Behaviour” for judges.

      – To decide who will serve within our nation by vote (elections, though we have negated our duty there to make sure that OUR Elections are honest)

      – To use the **Grand Jury to investigate anyone “We the people” want investigated for any reason or to make sure that they are being honest and not corrupt.

      **“The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.

      “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

      “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

      “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

      “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

      “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”

      “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful or legal) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

      — As the enforcement arm (Militia) that both those that serve within the state and federal government are REQUIRED to use. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:

      — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
      — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      (Now you know who is supposed to be defending our borders – WE are, or rather we as the US military trained Militia Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16:
      “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

      (Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.”)

      Yes, those who are ex military are to be our trainers if we did not serve.

      John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States 475: “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

      Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

      But both those that serve within the state and the general governments are REQUIRED to use the Militia of each state when needed. So you can see that the Militia is everyone and is constitutionally mandated. More importantly within the Second Amendment is the ONLY place within the US Constitution that the word “necessary” is used. That is because the Militia is the ONLY thing they felt was necessary for us to keep those that serve within our governments lawful, and to keep our freedom. They also felt that we needed to manufacture our own (factories) to create all arms, including all military type arms so that those who serve could not control that aspect to take over the people.

      George Washington: “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

      Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788: “Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people”.

      William Rawle: “The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.”

      The Preamble to the US Constitution says, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

      This means that the people themselves are the last word on all of those who serve within the branches of our governments, though that “last word” must also be “in Pursuance thereof” the US Constitution.

      Justice Potter Stewart: “The 4th Amendment and the personal rights it secures have a long history. At the very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “[A] strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means.

      Thomas Jefferson: “…To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps… The Constitution has erected no such tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruption of time and party, its members would become despots….”

      Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822): “For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution.”

      Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846): ” `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.”

      Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859): “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”

      Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878): “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm … is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege.”

      “In truth, when the government comes to take your ARMS, they are VIOLATING THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND that governs political powers. ”

      And also they are violating the contract that they are under, so breaking the Oath is a felony(at least one) and the crime of Perjury, which also makes them no longer meet the contract.

      Thank you for your comment, I really enjoyed reading it and am looking to reading more!

      Dr. Vieira: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides…

      The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights…
      The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights.
      The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.

      … the famous case Norton v. Shelby County… The Court said: “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

      And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution…”
      What are the defining characteristics of a limited government?
      They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion.
      But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera.
      “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.
      …” (End Dr. Vieira quote)

  32. Amanda whitmire says:

    AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH I STAND! I’ve read some of the comments the one Dan made was brilliantly deceptive as most brain washed people do think that way but what you fail to realize which I doubt deep down is that the constitution is what it is the corrupt leaders who want to control the populace are highly intelligent in what they do that however doesn’t mean they have the power to change the roots of our foundation anyone who says different either doesn’t know refuses to believe or has a vested interest in the contrary it’s not a paradox they just want you to believe it is wake up when they come for you then you will have the choice is there anything more important than true GOD GIVEN FREEDOM TO LIVE PEACEABLY THE WAY IN WHICH YOU CHOOSE when it comes to my family and my life then MY GOD WILL PROTECT ME AND LEAD US ALL IT TAKES FOR EVIL MEN TO PREVAIL IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING Ben franklin

  33. Timmy Alfoa says:

    “You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty.”

    Great news! All of my life I’ve been a night owl and have faced constant police harassment for being out at night. They’ll run my drivers license to check for warrants, interrogate me as to my destination and intentions, sometimes fabricate a traffic violation to justify pulling me over, and I’ve been told by officers more than once that, although there is no adult curfew, I should stay indoors late at night. I had no idea that it has been my right all along to kill these treading government representatives.

  34. kyle jennings says:

    YES we not only have the right to fight, it is our responsibility as citizens of this once great country! We as Americans have been lazy and let these satanic idiots turn our country into the most hated country and people alive!The satanic elite have sixteen trillion American dollars in foreign banks and this practice needs to be stopped.After we take our country back and we will be doing so very soon we should make right all the wrong doings of these scumbags and they should all be tried according to our laws for treason and aiding and abetting as well as every crime they have committed as well as every Senator and Congressman and all past Presidents still living off the fat and if guilty should be stripped of everything they own and sold and the proceeds used to pay down the debt they created then hung by the neck publicly until dead. One more thing for all true patriots to think about ex President George Bush is guilty of murder for all our brothers and sisters in the twin towers on 911 there were no 767 jumbo jets made out of aluminum that penetrated a concrete and steel reinforced building that would require something only God could do and that would be a MIRACLE!!! So why are the politicians not demanding for the arrest of the parties involved? The very first politician I would like to see brought to charges is Senator John McCain he is a disgrace to all American soldiers as well as citizens as a former POW he knows better than all the rest and should have led the charge to arrest all accused parties.If anyone reading this still think airplanes brought the towers down go get your most powerful weapon and shoot some concrete then go make an appointment to see a doctor if you still think planes did this,I’m not trying to offend anyone I’m just trying to get you to think? If you would like to respond just ask the editors for my address I have no problem with them giving it to anyone wanting it and may Almighty God have mercy on all us including the ones we are going to be fighting very soon, because the very minute they declare Marshall Law is the same minite I personally declare war on all Federal Govt. officials and anyone acting on or for their behalf anyone trying to take my weapons or rights will cause one of us to surely die. God bless us all!!!

  35. Chiefosage says:

    What brings more fear to my heart than a confrontation with this government is the thought of living under a Tyranny and absolute despotism. Misery with no end.

  36. Sovereign_Citizen says:

    If they come for you, do you have a responsibility to fight? Yes, as a matter of fact, if you are unwilling to fight, you will be shot.

  37. Cap cloud says:

    If and when that time comes it will be obvious to all .Individually we will fall organized in to open uniformed units we be crushed because they have they heavy weapons and armor and the air power.We would loose in any pitched battle becaus of this .Light fast units small,large and individual Operations ,blending into the population and or wilderness will be the path to victory .Using unconventional tactics always fighting outside the box with cunning, ingenuity, audacity and guts .Wearing them down one shot at a time .Always being careful never to hit innocents .My bigger hope is that the vast majority of the governments muscle will refuse to follow orders .That the local sheriffs will stand against enforcement of any such laws .The hope is that the government will quickly see the futility of their action direct or indirect and strike such unconstitutional actions from the law before such drastic action would be necessary .If it happens that the fight must be fought all other options are not viable yes I will stand ,yes I will fight ,Imwill lay down my life that rights given by God are not denied by the state .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *